Nearly three decades have passed since Mademoiselle B.P. and I were a couple. This woman, a bit older than me, grew up in a small village in France and had a most beguiling accent. I regret not having asked her about the French Revolution (1789–1799), although my impression is that contemporary Gallic people regard it with some pride—liberté, égalité, fraternité and all that. There is no doubt that France in the late 18th century was in dire need of reform; the royals, the hereditary elites and the Catholic church had a stranglehold on economic and social power, and most of the people were fed up.
My main complaint about the French Revolution—and I wonder whether Mlle. B.P. would have agreed—is the frenzied killing that just went on and on. Called the Reign of Terror, it saw more than 40,000 people put to death. That includes, of course, King Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette, Georges-Jacques Danton and Maximillien Robespierre. The latter two were among the most vociferous in sending opponents, or anybody considered ideologically impure, to the guillotine. As for the former two, I will just say that regicide is very serious business. The English did it to King Charles I in 1649, something that is much regretted even today. Dethroning and/or sending a king or queen into exile would seem to be adequate chastisement, regardless of how bad or incompetent his or her reign was. (Tsar Nicholas II would also suffer death at the hands of the Bolsheviks in 1918.)
A commoner myself, I have little sympathy for any nation’s royalty. And in the matter of the French Revolution, the Girondin, Jacobin and Montagnard parties are one and the same to me. I do, however, feel for the average Frenchmen and -women who for no good reason were accused, given a perfunctory trial or no trial at all and then killed. Many lost their heads when the blade fell in the Place de la Révolution. Most of all, I grieve for those priests, nuns and lay Christians who died because of the extreme anti-clerical sentiment of the day.
Victor Hugo, the great 19th century French writer, exaggerated just slightly when saying that the revolution “threw open the monasteries, snatched away the veils, aired out the sacristies and slew the Holy Office.” A series of policies undertaken during those chaotic 10 years sought to do no less than de-Christianize France. Regarding the faith once planted so deeply in French soil and which inspired people to erect some of the most splendid cathedrals in all of Europe as nothing but superstition and mythology, the Dantons and Robespierres instituted short-lived absurdities like the deistic Cult of the Supreme Being and the atheistic Cult of Reason. It is said that more French people were reading Voltaire than the Bible even before the revolution commenced, but this just accelerated the process.
The murderous rage directed toward Christians is what I find most stunning. It was more than the guillotine. Many believers were deported, imprisoned, shot and suffered mob violence. These were not just fat and corrupt bishops, but God-loving priests, monks and nuns, not to mention rank-and-file church members—people who certainly did not deserve an early and violent death.
I draw your attention to the drownings at Nantes. Rural western France was Catholic and conservative, and so abolition of the monarchy and subjugation of the clergy were resisted. The people in Nantes paid a heavy price for that stance in late 1793 and early 1794. Anyone suspected of not fully supporting the revolution was dubbed a royalist and subject to stern punishment. Priests, nuns, peasants, women and children had good reason to fear. A monster named Jean-Baptiste Carrier had been sent from Paris to enforce the new laws, and he did so with utmost vigor. Regarding Nantes as a hotbed of counter-revolutionary activity, he ordered the execution of at least 4,000 civilians. Most were drowned in the Loire River, which he insouciantly called “the national bathtub.” Carrier was hailed in the capitol, but political winds shifted and he was denounced, arrested, tried and finally decapitated on December 16, 1794.
On a smaller scale but no less awful was what happened around the same time in Compiègne, in the northern part of the country. A convent of Carmelite nuns founded there in 1641 and supported by the French court was noted for religious fervor and fidelity. The women were told to choose between the revolutionary government—such as it was—and breaking their vows of obedience, chastity and poverty. All of them refused to cooperate. They were taken to Paris and given a trial. Lacking legal counsel, their verdict was a foregone conclusion. On the night of July 17, 1794, sixteen sisters ranging in age from 29 to 78 were transported through the streets in an open cart. They sang hymns of praise and supplication (the Miserere, the Salve Regina, the Evening Vespers, the Compline and the Laudate Dominum from Psalm 116) as onlookers berated them and threw refuse; some, let it be noted, had pity and offered comfort. Nearing the scaffold, they kissed a statue of the Virgin Mary, forgave their captors and submitted to the guillotine. Their heads and bodies were buried in a mass grave at nearby Picpus Cemetery. The martyrs of Compiègne may have helped bring about an end to the Reign of Terror, as Robespierre was administered the old chop-chop 10 days later. Danton had already gotten his, on April 5.
Devastating though these events were to Christianity in France, it survived. French priests continued to minister to their own flocks, and some went to distant Korea in the mid-19th century, preached the Gospel and suffered martyrdom as well. Their numbers include Laurent-Joseph-Marius Imbert, Siméon-François Berneux, Pierre Maubant, Jacques Chastan, Just-de-Bretenières, Louis Beaulieu, Pierre-Henri Dorie, Antoine Daveluy, Pierre Aumaître and Martin-Luc Huin. Post-modern French intellectuals, far too smart to believe in God, may consider them fools who died needlessly. I view them as strong men, men of faith and worthy of deep respect.
#frenchrevolution #danton #robespierre #nantesdrownings #christianityinfrance #victorhugo #reignofterror #compiegnmartyrs #picpuscemetery
14 Comments
I enjoyed your article although I was never much for world history I all ways enjoy your writings
Thanks for reading it, Billy… BA seniors 71!
Brilliantly done.
I liked the intro with the third person, feet on the ground reporter style.
This subject is loaded with sub-topics ranging from the violence and inhumane acts of the papacy and the royalty, the politics of mixing royalty and religion together, and then sub-sub-topics of debauchery and corruptness of the Catholic Church, the brutality of the throne, poverty versus opulence because of a station in life.
They don’t call this period of time and the previous 500 years the Dark Ages for nothing. Some try to soften the vitriolic history by framing it as the Middle Ages, but with all you have pointed it, it was definitely Dark!
I am one who is very thankful for the Age of Enlightenment a.k.a., the Renaissance which by the way came about as a result of the pen (of people like you) who saw injustice and then with their pen, railed against the system encouraging reform from top, down….
Insurrection and revolution happen when you violate the trust of the people you rule over by starving them, killing them, taxing them, and destroying their lives while living in the lap of luxury.
Many of these brave philosophers and of course the printing press that promulgated their truth/viewpoints, paved the way for their revolution and I can only imagine how John Locke’s words , “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” fueled the success of both the American and French Revolution. I seem to recall the Benjamin Franklin was living in France for lengthy periods of time prior to our revolution and surely, he and probably others, learned these philosophies and then brought this thinking back to America.
The courage, bravery, the penmanship of the philosophers were adopted along with much of their thinking, thence some of the exact phrases and concepts showed up in the documents that we still hold dear…. do you not agree?
Yes, or at least I think so…
Nicely done, Richard. It never ceases to amaze me how historically idiotic men huddle together under the guise of religion and self righteousness…what goes around comes around. The true heroes are those who stood defiant in their belief and knew that a better place awaited them after their last breath seeped away. I often wonder (literally) how God can keep from distinguishing the “flame” of that called earth. But He foretold through the scriptures of much to come before all is set right. Keep on writing, brother.
I write because I must!
Thanks for the interesting article, Richard. I agree that the French Revolution was very violent. Considering its historical background, it stands reason to assume that the French people at the time of the revolution didn’t have as much respect for human rights and life as we do today. As you’re well aware it’s been only about 150 years since colored people were seen as human beings.
You make a very good point, Tim, one I should have made myself (changing views of human rights).
Thank you for an interesting article. Always enjoyable to receive your articles. Hope your doing well.
Thanks for reading it, Janene.
Another fascinating story, Richard!
I remember the fear, disbelief, curiosity, deep sorrow vividly when I first read the history of French Revolution.
Sadly, as George Santayana meant in his remarks “history seems to repeats itself”.
During the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution in China, genocide committed by Khmer Rouge in Cambodia to name a few, too many ordinary people were killed by demonic dictators for political or other absurd reasons in reaction to the previous equally problematic systems.
I just hope humanity will prevail in the possible turmoil in the future when we face serious problems of political, economic, environmental nature.
Thank you very much for great story that made me think about history, human nature again.
Matthew: I hope so too, but I fear there will be more turmoil….
Richard, I wish I’d had more free time to savor this article, but alas. . . a new puppy in the hands of an old man like me is a recipe for disaster — and exhaustion. Luckily, the little ball of energy needed a few hours of sleep, albeit on my lap while I type!
Your scholarly research was superb. You painted a clear picture of the chaos of the times. Although I studied a little French in high school and college, I was certainly NEVER a Francophile, so I love how you uncovered fascinating anecdotes like the Carmelite nuns’ story and the drownings at Nantes.
We all like accounts of historical events that can be tied up in nice, neat packages, but that’s rarely the case. A cultural upheaval as complex and monumental as the French Revolution could not have occurred in any sort of step-by-step or orderly fashion. Mayhem, madness and fear were more likely to be the order of the day, as you’ve described. Often, only long after the fact do seemingly minimally-related events come into focus as actually being closely related components of the same end result. In the case of La révolution française, that result was democracy.
In light of what’s happening in the U.S. today, most interesting to me was the relationship between the Church and the government. As I grew up, as a Protestant Midwesterner, I considered the Church to be THE arbiter for moral and ethical questions. Today, given the tight relationship between the most outspoken Christians — evangelicals — and the Right’s insurrectionists and traitors, the moral guideposts are muddied at best.
Both then and now, the Church is acting as the instrument of the status quo and conservatism, rather than as a beacon of light for the oppressed.
Chaos reigned in Washington on Dec. 7 and at places like Charlottesville in August 2017. I’d hate to think that someday we reflect on these as part of the lore surrounding the second “La révolution américaine” that leads to the abolition of democracy and the installation of an autocracy. We can only hope similar events remain viewed as rebellious actions undertaken by fringe extremist groups.
Mike, thanks for your comment. But I see no connection between the topic and “fringe extremist groups” in the contemporary USA or Charlottesville or whatever.
Add Comment